Here's where most enterprises go wrong with AI: They think success means collecting everything possible. In reality, we've helped clients build AI systems that perform better than their legacy systems while using significantly less customer data.
"There's this sense we have with Gen AI that you just need to feed the machine," Trube observed from her work leading data efforts on our core AI program. "Companies are feeling pressure to differentiate themselves with Gen AI by stockpiling all of their data so that they can feed their machine data no one else has."
But this "data hoarding" approach, as she calls it, "goes completely against a core data privacy principle which is minimization."
The key insight? Companies that practice thoughtful data collection, focusing on quality over quantity, often build better AI systems. They're forced to be more strategic about what they collect, more sophisticated about feature engineering and more focused on genuine business outcomes. This doesn't mean collecting less data necessarily, but collecting the right data. After all, AI systems are only as good as the data that powers them, and without sufficient, high-quality data, even the most advanced algorithms will underperform. The goal isn't data minimization for its own sake, but rather purposeful data collection that balances privacy principles with the substantial data requirements that effective AI demands.
Gaurav Goel, our technology lead who works with major financial services clients on digital transformation, sees this firsthand: "We apply principles while we are devising new products for the customers, taking on data security and confidentiality with utmost care. We take considerations in terms of what minimum data to capture, how to store the data, how to synchronize the data."
The result isn't limitation—it's clarity and efficiency.